Hollywood's Cavalry Charges vs. Medieval Reality
A new analysis by The Collector debunks Hollywood's depiction of medieval cavalry charges, arguing that real combat relied on psychology and discipline rather than brute force. Historian Sir John Keegan noted that horses naturally refuse to charge into dense infantry, as seen at the Battle of Hastings in 1066, where the Anglo-Saxon shield wall repelled Norman cavalry. Successful charges depended on breaking enemy morale, not physical collision. Cavalry would feign retreat to lure infantry out of formation, then attack. Mass and momentum were key, but charges were slow and disciplined, with lances presented at the last moment. The article uses examples from the Bayeux Tapestry and paintings by Hans Krell to illustrate historical accuracy.
Key facts
- Horses naturally refuse to charge into dense infantry formations.
- Historian Sir John Keegan noted cavalry charges often failed against disciplined infantry.
- At the Battle of Hastings in 1066, the Anglo-Saxon shield wall repelled Norman cavalry.
- Successful cavalry charges relied on psychology and breaking enemy morale.
- Cavalry would feign retreat to lure infantry out of formation.
- Real charges were slow and disciplined, not full-pace as in Hollywood.
- Mass and momentum were key, with lances presented at the last moment.
- The Bayeux Tapestry and Hans Krell's paintings depict historical cavalry tactics.
Entities
Artists
- Hans Krell
Institutions
- The Collector
- Wingnut Films
- New Line Cinema
- National Museum in Warsaw
- Wikimedia Commons
Locations
- Battle of Hastings
- England
- Gniew
- Poland