EU Court Rules Geoblocking Valid Digital Border in Anne Frank Manuscript Case
On July 9, 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union determined that geoblocking serves as a legitimate digital boundary, safeguarding cultural institutions from international copyright disputes. The case centered on a Belgian site that offered Anne Frank's diary manuscripts for free while restricting access to Dutch IP addresses to adhere to copyright regulations. The Anne Frank Fonds, established by Otto Frank in 1963, initiated a lawsuit for copyright violation, asserting that users could circumvent the geoblock using VPNs. The court concluded that the ability to access content indirectly through VPNs does not imply that the publisher is targeting the Dutch audience. This decision facilitates the digitization and online sharing of heritage works in public domain countries with appropriate geoblocking, underscoring the copyright inconsistencies within EU nations.
Key facts
- The Court of Justice of the European Union issued a ruling on July 9, 2026.
- The case involved a Belgian website publishing Anne Frank's diary manuscripts for free.
- The website used geoblocking to prevent Dutch IP addresses from accessing the content.
- The Anne Frank Fonds, founded in 1963 in Basel by Otto Frank, holds the rights to Anne Frank's works.
- The court ruled that geoblocking is a valid digital border.
- Indirect technical accessibility via VPN does not imply targeting the public of a protected member state.
- Users who bypass geoblocking via VPN violate access conditions, not the publisher.
- The ruling provides legal security for cultural institutions and researchers digitizing heritage works.
Entities
Artists
- Anne Frank
Institutions
- Court of Justice of the European Union
- Supreme Court of the Netherlands
- Anne Frank Fonds
- Anne Frank Stichting
Locations
- Netherlands
- Belgium
- Basel
- Switzerland
- Amsterdam