ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

Tolstoy's 1906 Shakespeare Critique Provokes Orwell's 1947 Response on Religious vs. Humanist Art

publication · 2026-04-15

In 1906, Leo Tolstoy released an essay denouncing William Shakespeare as an 'insignificant, inartistic writer' whose literature encouraged immorality. This criticism emerged during Tolstoy's shift to Christian anarchism, where he championed the Russian peasantry and opposed the aristocracy. He attributed Shakespeare's popularity to an 'epidemic suggestion' propagated by 18th-century German scholars and critiqued 'King Lear' for its lack of artistic value. In response, George Orwell wrote 'Lear, Tolstoy and the Fool' in 1947, framing the debate as a confrontation between religious and humanist ideologies. Orwell highlighted psychological similarities between Tolstoy and King Lear while defending Shakespeare's 'exuberance' and humanism, emphasizing the conflict between religious and humanist evaluations in art.

Key facts

  • Leo Tolstoy published a 1906 essay criticizing William Shakespeare
  • Tolstoy called Shakespeare 'an insignificant, inartistic writer'
  • Tolstoy specifically analyzed 'King Lear' in his critique
  • George Orwell responded in 1947 with 'Lear, Tolstoy and the Fool'
  • Orwell framed the conflict as religious versus humanist attitudes
  • Orwell suggested Tolstoy identified with King Lear's character
  • Tolstoy wrote during his Christian anarchist period after conversion
  • The original post appeared on Open Culture in 2016 before 2026 update

Entities

Artists

Institutions

  • Open Culture

Locations

  • Russia
  • Durham
  • North Carolina

Sources