ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

Readers defend gallery display practices against 'art overload' criticism

opinion-review · 2026-06-10

In reaction to a Guardian piece that condemned art galleries for exhibiting excessive amounts of work, readers Dr. Penelope Jackson, Sue Lewis, and Fiona Willan contend that these institutions are under conflicting pressures. They highlight that while guests are encouraged not to view every artwork, galleries also face backlash for not showcasing enough of their collections. For instance, the National Gallery in London displays around 40% of its holdings, surpassing Tate Britain, which presents only a small portion, while the National Portrait Gallery would find it challenging to exhibit its entire collection. The authors of the letter stress that galleries are in a difficult position, aiming to display as much as feasible without mandating that visitors see every piece.

Key facts

  • Dr Penelope Jackson, Sue Lewis, and Fiona Willan responded to a Guardian article and letters on art overload
  • The original article was titled 'The hill I will die on: Let me tell you the one big problem with art galleries. There’s too much art' and published 30 May
  • Follow-up letters were published 5 June
  • The National Gallery in London hangs about 40% of its collection
  • Tate Britain shows a tiny fraction of its collection at any given time
  • The National Portrait Gallery would struggle to hang its entire collection
  • Galleries are criticized both for showing too much and for not showing enough
  • The letter argues visitors do not have to view every piece

Entities

Artists

  • Dr Penelope Jackson
  • Sue Lewis
  • Fiona Willan

Institutions

Locations

  • London
  • United Kingdom

Sources