Publishers Sue Google Over AI Training on Copyrighted Works
Several publishing companies and authors, including prominent names such as Hachette and Scott Turow, have initiated a class action lawsuit against Google in the Southern District of New York. They accuse the tech giant of illegally utilizing their copyrighted materials to develop its AI model, Gemini. The plaintiffs assert that Google altered or omitted copyright details to conceal its actions. Furthermore, internal communications from Google express concerns over the potential for significant legal consequences and fines reaching $100 billion. This lawsuit follows others in the AI sector but could lead to a distinct resolution given Google's relationships with the publishing industry.
Key facts
- Lawsuit filed by Hachette, Cengage, Elsevier, Scott Turow, and S.C.R.I.B.E.
- Google accused of using copyrighted works to train Gemini AI
- Plaintiffs allege Google removed copyright information to conceal infringement
- Case filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
- Google allegedly copied works from Google Books and Google Play Store
- Internal Google document warns of potential fines up to $100 billion
- Anthropic fined $1.5 billion for copyright infringement in separate case
- Early California rulings favored AI companies under fair use doctrine
Entities
Artists
- Scott Turow
- NK Jemisin
- Lemony Snicket
Institutions
- Hachette
- Cengage
- Elsevier
- S.C.R.I.B.E.
- Meta
- OpenAI
- Anthropic
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
- Hachette Book Group
- Cengage Learning
- Google Books
- Google Play Books
- Google Scholar
Locations
- California
- United States
- New York