ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

Philosophers Weigh In on Cancel Culture vs. Accountability

opinion-review · 2026-09-28

TheCollector explores the concept of cancel culture through a philosophical perspective, focusing on the 2018 incident involving Kevin Hart and the Oscars. Following his appointment as host, old homophobic tweets re-emerged, prompting Hart to resign and issue an apology to the LGBTQ community. Cancel culture impacts not only celebrities but also everyday individuals who may face online harassment and job termination. Public shaming is analyzed through social contract theory as a means of enforcing societal norms, yet some argue it leads to mob mentality. Utilitarianism defends canceling to avert harm, raising issues of unfair punishment. The article advocates for a balance between accountability and empathy, emphasizing dialogue and opportunities for growth, supported by various artists' works.

Key facts

  • Kevin Hart stepped down as Oscars host in 2018 after old homophobic tweets resurfaced.
  • Cancel culture involves public shaming and boycotts, often on social media.
  • Social contract theory, linked to Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, views shaming as enforcing societal norms.
  • Utilitarianism, associated with Mill and Bentham, assesses cancel culture by its overall consequences.
  • Kantian ethics emphasizes human dignity and opposes permanent condemnation for past errors.
  • Virtue ethics, from Aristotle, promotes character growth and constructive criticism over punishment.
  • Social identity theory explains groupthink and echo chambers in cancel culture.
  • The article suggests balancing accountability with empathy and dialogue.

Entities

Artists

Institutions

Locations

  • Ghent
  • Belgium
  • Philadelphia
  • United States
  • Madrid
  • Spain
  • London
  • United Kingdom
  • New York City

Sources