Francis Picabia and Rosemarie Trockel: The Idée Fixe and Enigmatic Art
In a reposted essay, the author examines the concept of the idée fixe—a preexisting force that drives artists to resist interpretation—through the work of Francis Picabia and Rosemarie Trockel. Picabia's late paintings, made after World War II during personal declines, are currently on view at Hauser & Wirth (May 1–August 1, 2025). Trockel has concurrent shows at Sprüth Magers (May 8–August 1, 2025) and Gladstone (May 7–August 1, 2025). The essay argues that Picabia's final works, neglected for decades, preempt postmodernism by rejecting stylistic conventions while maintaining a pure, self-reflexive painting practice. Trockel's work similarly resists interpretation, using signifiers of femininity without reducing them to feminist commentary. The author criticizes writers like Deborah Drier and Katherine Guinness for imposing symbolic readings that betray the art's enigmatic content. Drawing on Adorno, Clark, and Valéry, the essay posits that the idée fixe offers a way to navigate art beyond modernist historicism and postmodern interpretation, emphasizing the value of ambiguity and the artist's devotion to art's internal logic. The text concludes that art's purpose is to reflect utopian fragments of lived experience, and that intransigent artists who follow the idée fixe remain essential.
Key facts
- Francis Picabia's late works are exhibited at Hauser & Wirth from May 1 to August 1, 2025.
- Rosemarie Trockel's 'Material' is on view at Sprüth Magers from May 8 to August 1, 2025.
- Rosemarie Trockel's 'The Kiss' is on view at Gladstone from May 7 to August 1, 2025.
- The essay reposted was originally published a year ago and expands on ideas from a recent essay in The Point.
- Picabia's late paintings were made after World War II during declines in fame, health, and financial security.
- The author criticizes Benjamin Buchloh for deriding Picabia's post-Dada figurative work as reactionary.
- Katherine Guinness's book 'Schizogenesis: The Art of Rosemarie Trockel' is cited as an egregious example of misinterpretation.
- The essay references Theodor W. Adorno, T. J. Clark, and Paul Valéry to frame the discussion of enigmatic art.
Entities
Artists
- Francis Picabia
- Rosemarie Trockel
- Theodor W. Adorno
- T. J. Clark
- Paul Valéry
- Marcel Duchamp
- Pablo Picasso
- Georges Braque
- Gustave Courbet
- Charles Baudelaire
- Stéphane Mallarmé
- Paul Verlaine
- Arthur Rimbaud
- Joris-Karl Huysmans
- T. S. Eliot
- Ezra Pound
- Salomon Reinach
- Joaquín Folch y Torres
- Asger Jorn
- Per Kirkeby
- Lutz Bacher
- Cady Noland
- Trisha Donnelly
- Martin Herbert
- Isabelle Graw
- Lynne Cooke
- Dore Ashton
- Deborah Drier
- Katherine Guinness
- Brigitte Bardot
- Bertolt Brecht
- Jacques Lacan
- Hélène Cixous
- Martin Kippenberger
- Manet
- da Vinci
- Proust
- Joyce
- Kafka
- Beckett
- Pollock
- Thelonious Monk
- Velázquez
- Philip IV
- Gottlieb
- Rothko
- Monika
- Samuel Beckett
- Marcel Proust
- James Joyce
- Franz Kafka
- Jackson Pollock
- Édouard Manet
- Leonardo da Vinci
- Paul Cézanne
- T.S. Eliot
- Michael Krebber
- René Magritte
- Adolph Gottlieb
- Mark Rothko
- Diego Velázquez
- Gilles Deleuze
- Félix Guattari
- Charles-Augustin Sainte-Beuve
- Jean-Claude Lebensztejn
- Benjamin Buchloh
Institutions
- Hauser & Wirth
- Sprüth Magers
- Gladstone
- The Point
- Selva Journal
- Artforum
- Le Constitutionnel
- Sammlung Goetz
- Hatje Cantz Verlag
- 125 Newbury
- Bowdoin College Museum of Art
- Substack
- Manhattan Art Review
- TMAR
- MutualArt
- Kapital
- Focus
- Académie française
Locations
- New York
- United States
- Paris
- France
- Kamchatka
- Cologne
- Germany
- Zurich
- Switzerland