ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

Debate Over Literary Decline: Can We Measure a Nation's Reading Culture?

opinion-review · 2026-09-09

In a recent essay for ArtsJournal, Michael Rushton explores whether statistical data can truly represent the literary culture of the English-speaking world. He refers to James Marriott's upcoming book, which posits that we are entering the 'dawn of the post-literate society,' and contrasts this with Henry Oliver's critique in The Common Reader. Rushton aligns more closely with Marriott, suggesting that statistical evaluations fall short. He points out that in 2025, the US will have over 600,000 traditionally published books and that 46.6% of adults in Indiana engage with literature, arguing these statistics fail to indicate quality. Rushton expresses similar doubts about other art forms, urging for more subjective criticism and warning against a decline in commentary quality. He concludes with a link to his Substack.

Key facts

  • James Marriott argues we are at the 'dawn of the post-literate society' in a forthcoming book.
  • Henry Oliver provides pushback to Marriott's analysis on The Common Reader.
  • Over 600,000 books were traditionally published in the US in 2025.
  • 46.6% of adults in Indiana read novels, short stories, poetry, or plays.
  • Rushton cites Christie's auction prices as an inadequate measure of visual art's state.
  • Rushton references the cultural data project 'Arts Vibrancy' as an example of flawed quantification.
  • The essay is cross-posted on Michael Rushton's Substack.
  • Rushton adopts a Humean perspective on subjective criticism.

Entities

Artists

  • James Marriott
  • Henry Oliver
  • Michael Rushton

Institutions

  • ArtsJournal
  • The Common Reader
  • Penguin Random House
  • New York Times Book Review
  • Substack

Locations

  • United States
  • Indiana
  • Michigan

Sources