Analysis of Selective Criticism in International Conflicts and Realpolitik

An opinion piece examines the application of realpolitik in international relations, focusing on Iran and regional dynamics. It argues that states often prioritize national interests over humanitarian concerns, leading to instability and human suffering. The article notes that Iran's actions, including those by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and Quds Force, have contributed to regional tensions, while also criticizing selective outrage from other nations. It highlights impacts such as reduced oil production in the Persian Gulf, disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, and effects on global markets. The piece calls for a consistent approach to realism in foreign policy, rather than applying it unevenly across different countries. The source is an opinion article from SCMP, discussing these issues in the context of Asia and Middle Eastern geopolitics.