Why Keeping Museums Closed During Pandemic Is the Saddest but Fairest Choice
Massimiliano Tonelli argues that keeping museums closed during the pandemic, while sad, is the most just decision. He refutes the idea that closures are a conspiracy against culture, emphasizing that many museums are complex machines calibrated for specific visitor volumes and revenue streams. Reopening without sufficient public—due to travel restrictions and lockdowns—would incur unsustainable costs, strain staff shortages, and risk damaging relationships with concessionaires. Tonelli notes that museums continue research and conservation work behind closed doors, and that staying closed allows them to preserve financial resources for a proper reopening. He advocates for tailored measures rather than blanket policies, but ultimately supports the government's cautious approach.
Key facts
- Museums are complex machines calibrated for specific visitor volumes and revenue streams.
- Reopening without sufficient public would incur unsustainable costs and strain staff shortages.
- Museums continue research and conservation work behind closed doors.
- Staying closed allows museums to preserve financial resources for a proper reopening.
- Tonelli advocates for tailored measures rather than blanket policies.
- The article is by Massimiliano Tonelli on Artribune.
- The article was published in January 2021.
- Tonelli mentions that museums have received state contributions.
Entities
Artists
- Massimiliano Tonelli
Institutions
- Artribune
- Uffizi
- Pompei
Locations
- Italy