Who Decides What Art Is?
Stefano Monti examines the power dynamics behind defining art in contemporary society. He identifies three centers of power: political, economic-financial, and the multitude (public opinion). Despite the internet's democratizing effects, the art world remains resistant to disintermediation, relying on experts—critics, curators, gallerists—to validate artistic value. Monti argues this preserves a distance between art and the masses, contrasting with music and film where niche audiences thrive. He suggests the market's desire for guaranteed value perpetuates intermediaries, as collectors prefer works with institutional backing. Political influence is noted but often leads to propaganda. The NFT phenomenon briefly challenged this structure, but physical art remains dominant. Monti concludes that the system is too entrenched for a new 'urinal' to upend conventions.
Key facts
- Stefano Monti is a partner at Monti&Taft.
- The article was published on Artribune in March 2025.
- Three centers of power in art: political, economic-financial, multitude.
- Internet has eroded elite influence in many sectors but not art.
- Art still relies on intermediaries like critics, curators, and gallerists.
- Disintermediation in art is rare; most collectors buy through established channels.
- NFTs represented a recent attempt to challenge the system.
- Political influence on art can lead to propaganda.
- Galleries use websites as 'off-galleries' with lower prices but retain validation.
- Monti questions whether a new 'urinal' could disrupt current conventions.
Entities
Artists
- Stefano Monti
Institutions
- Artribune
- Monti&Taft
Locations
- Italy