When is photography considered art? Legal criteria for copyright protection in Italy
Italian law distinguishes between 'photographic works of creative character' and 'simple photographs' lacking creativity, with the former enjoying full copyright protection (life + 70 years) and the latter only a 20-year related right. The key criterion is whether the photograph reflects the author's personality through free and creative choices, as established by Italian courts (App. Milano, 20 September 2010) and the EU Court of Justice (C-145/10, 1 January 2011). The article discusses the difficulty judges face in assessing creativity, especially for works like Thomas Ruff's Portraits series, which deliberately adopt an objective, impassive style (Düsseldorf School). Some rulings have considered the photographer's fame and the work's 'artistic merit' (Trib. Roma, 20 December 2006; Pret. Torino, 27 May 1996), though the prevailing view excludes aesthetic merit as a requirement. The author, Federica Minio, an art and IP lawyer, argues that institutional recognition (museums, galleries, auctions) can signal authorship, referencing Denis Curti's statement that galleries affirm a photographer's authorship. Full copyright protection for photography in Italy was established only in 1979 with D.P.R. 19/1979, amending the 1941 Copyright Law.
Key facts
- Italian Copyright Law (Legge Autore) distinguishes between 'photographic works of creative character' (Art. 2) and 'simple photographs' (Art. 87 ff.).
- Creative photographic works are protected for the author's life plus 70 years; simple photographs enjoy a 20-year related right.
- The EU Court of Justice (C-145/10, 1 January 2011) ruled that photographs are works if they reflect the author's personality through free and creative choices.
- Italian courts require that the photograph shows the author's personality and interpretation of reality (App. Milano, 20 September 2010).
- Thomas Ruff's Portraits series exemplifies the challenge: his objective, impassive style (Düsseldorf School) may not reveal subjectivity to an untrained judge.
- Some rulings have relied on the photographer's fame and the work's 'artistic merit' (Trib. Roma, 20 December 2006; Pret. Torino, 27 May 1996), though aesthetic merit is not a legal requirement.
- Full copyright protection for photography in Italy began with D.P.R. 19/1979, amending the 1941 Copyright Law.
- Denis Curti stated that galleries affirm a photographer's authorship and quality, distinguishing them from amateurs.
Entities
Artists
- Thomas Ruff
- Federica Minio
- Denis Curti
Institutions
- MAXXI
- Morri e Rossetti
- Artribune
- Corte di Giustizia dell'Unione Europea
- Tribunale di Roma
- Pretura di Torino
- Appello di Milano
Locations
- Italy
- Rome
- Turin
- Milan
- Düsseldorf
- Germany