When Did Art Stop Being Rebellious? A Critique of Conformism
In a significant essay published on Artribune, Edoardo De Cobelli contends that the rebellious essence of contemporary art has diminished, supplanted by self-promotion and careerism. He juxtaposes the current 'obsequious' critics and curators with the militant artists from the 1960s and 1980s. De Cobelli attributes the waning of ideological challenges to the emergence of global digital capitalism, raising questions about the impact of 1970s activism. He points out the absence of dissenting perspectives in art criticism due to conflicts of interest, which promotes conformity. Advocating for the restoration of critical social value, he reflects on the yearning for change during the COVID-19 pandemic, cautioning that any reform might be superficial. He introduces the concept of 'Zeithaltung' and expresses concerns regarding totalitarian tendencies, asserting that without dissent, the aspiration for change loses significance.
Key facts
- Edoardo De Cobelli wrote the essay for Artribune.
- The essay contrasts today's 'obsequious' generation with the rebellious 1960s and 1980s.
- Hans Belting's 'end of art history' is referenced.
- The essay discusses the professionalization of the art world under global digital capitalism.
- De Cobelli criticizes self-censorship among art critics due to conflicts of interest.
- Antonio Grulli is cited regarding totalitarian drifts in the state of exception.
- Marinella Senatore's 'Protest Forms' (2017) is mentioned as an example.
- The concept of 'Zeithaltung' is introduced to describe attitude toward change.
- Tomasi di Lampedusa's maxim 'everything must change so that everything can stay the same' is quoted.
- The essay was published in May 2020 during the COVID-19 crisis.
Entities
Artists
- Edoardo De Cobelli
- Antonio Grulli
- Marinella Senatore
- Hans Belting
- Tomasi di Lampedusa
Institutions
- Artribune
- Queens Museum
Locations
- Italy
- New York