ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

US Backs South China Sea Ruling While Opposing ICC

opinion-review · 2026-07-28

The United States has signed a statement supporting the Permanent Court of Arbitration's 2016 ruling on the South China Sea, which invalidated most of China's maritime claims under the nine-dash line. This comes as the US simultaneously seeks to dismantle the International Criminal Court (ICC). The South China Sea tribunal was established under Annex VII of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), to which the US is not a party. The US is also not a party to the ICC. This dual stance highlights a selective approach to international law, where the US upholds rulings that challenge other states' sovereignty while opposing courts that could assert jurisdiction over its own actions. The contradiction raises questions about the consistency of American foreign policy.

Key facts

  • The US signed a statement upholding the Hague tribunal's South China Sea ruling.
  • The US is seeking to dismantle the International Criminal Court.
  • The South China Sea arbitration was based on the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
  • The US is not a party to UNCLOS or the ICC.
  • The Permanent Court of Arbitration served as the case's registry.
  • The arbitration invalidated most of Beijing's maritime claims, known as the nine-dash line.
  • The US supports one set of international laws while opposing another.
  • The article is an opinion piece published in the South China Morning Post.

Entities

Institutions

  • International Criminal Court
  • Permanent Court of Arbitration
  • United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
  • South China Morning Post

Locations

  • United States
  • China
  • The Hague
  • South China Sea

Sources