ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

The State and Future of Art Criticism in Italy

opinion-review · 2026-04-27

A renewed debate on art criticism has emerged in Italy, questioning where, how, and when criticism should be practiced. The discussion moves beyond the traditional newspaper cultural pages to include magazines, blogs, webzines, and social media profiles as legitimate venues. The author argues that criticism should not be confined to the review format; interviews, conversations with artists, and critical essays are equally valid if grounded in contemporary relevance. The timing of criticism is also examined, with the possibility that refusal or non-participation in a flawed system can itself be a political critical act. The author suggests that criticism's survival may lie in proximity—engaging with what one knows and frequents regularly—rather than nostalgia for past formats. The article was published in Artribune Magazine #76.

Key facts

  • Debate on art criticism has reignited in Italy.
  • The discussion focuses on where criticism can be practiced: newspapers, magazines, blogs, webzines, social media.
  • The author previously wrote on the crisis of training for future critics.
  • The current debate centers on the survival of the profession and obstacles to reaching critical positions.
  • Transparency in accessing privileged critical platforms remains lacking in 2024.
  • The review format is defended but not exclusive; interviews and critical essays are also valid.
  • Criticism can include refusal or non-participation as a political stance.
  • Proximity—critiquing what one knows intimately—is proposed as a survival strategy.

Entities

Institutions

  • Artribune

Locations

  • Italy

Sources