ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

The Credibility Crisis in Science: A Review of Plümper and Neumayer's New Book

publication · 2026-05-06

In a recent publication titled "The Credibility Crisis in Science," authors Thomas Plümper and Eric Neumayer delve into the increasing skepticism surrounding scientific integrity. They highlight the concept of 'tweaking,' where researchers present misleading findings, as being more perilous than direct fraud. The book references notable instances of data manipulation, including questionable Alzheimer’s research by Sylvain Lesné, disputed studies by Harvard's Francesca Gino, and the fabricated data of Diederick Stapel. While advocating for stricter peer review, the authors critique John Ioannidis's assertion about research validity and suggest that the text overlooks broader societal challenges and cultural dimensions, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Key facts

  • Thomas Plümper and Eric Neumayer published 'The Credibility Crisis in Science'.
  • The book defines 'tweaking' as a major threat to scientific integrity.
  • Sylvain Lesné manipulated images in Alzheimer's research, leading scientists astray for nearly 20 years.
  • Francesca Gino's fraudulent research at Harvard is discussed.
  • Diederick Stapel produced fictitious research and admitted dishonesty.
  • John Ioannidis's 2005 paper 'Why most published research findings are false' is critiqued as clickbait.
  • Plümper and Neumayer recommend peer review as the best detection strategy.
  • The reviewer criticizes the book for not defining 'science' and ignoring corporate influence.

Entities

Institutions

  • Time magazine
  • Harvard University
  • University of Texas
  • University of Minnesota
  • Stanford University
  • Monsanto
  • General Motors
  • General Electric
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of Utah

Locations

  • United States
  • France

Sources