The Artist-Manager Myth: A Harmful Contradiction
Christian Caliandro argues that the contemporary art market, driven by financial speculation, has become the most hostile environment for radical innovation. He distinguishes between two dissociated states of art: A) art as spectacle, product, consumption, performance, efficiency, result, gratification, profit; and B) art as research, experiment, pain, uncertainty, doubt, trauma, deviation, otherness, sharing, community, existence, everydayness, revolution, transformation, change, evolution. The market has forced art to fulfill extraneous roles like entertainment and concrete answers, while managerial culture has colonized art, distorting its premises. Caliandro cites Mark Fisher on capital as power and control, and references Robert Musil and Maurizio Fagiolo Dell’Arco. He sees glimmers of difference and alterity emerging, and the myth of the artist-manager finally revealed as an illusion.
Key facts
- Christian Caliandro authored the article.
- The article distinguishes between art as spectacle (A) and art as research (B).
- The current high-end art market is compared to financial speculation.
- The market is described as oligarchic and hierarchical, hostile to radical innovation.
- Mark Fisher is cited on capital colonizing art.
- Robert Musil's 'The Man Without Qualities' is quoted in the epigraph.
- Maurizio Fagiolo Dell’Arco's 'Rapporto 60' is referenced.
- The article suggests the artist-manager myth is a harmful contradiction.
Entities
Artists
- Christian Caliandro
- Maurizio Fagiolo Dell’Arco
- Mark Fisher
- Robert Musil
Institutions
- Accademia di Belle Arti di Firenze
- Symbola Fondazione per le Qualità italiane
- Artribune
- Bulzoni Editore
Locations
- Firenze
- Italia
- Roma