The Art Critic Must Not Collude with Artists
Pericle Guaglianone argues that the crisis in Italian art criticism stems not from a lack of proximity between critics and artists, but from an excess of it. He contends that the curator, a product of the critic-artist symbiosis, has come to dominate, marginalizing autonomous, evaluative criticism. Guaglianone calls for a revival of detached, pungent writing—exemplified by figures like Piero Scaruffi, Paolo Mereghetti, and Aldo Grasso—and warns against the dilution of critical judgment through social collusion. He cites historical precedents from Baudelaire to Pasolini and Carla Lonzi to underscore the need for parrhesia and explicit critique. The article, published on Artribune, urges a return to sharp, independent art writing.
Key facts
- Pericle Guaglianone wrote the article for Artribune.
- The article was published in November 2023.
- Guaglianone argues that critics and artists are already too close, not too distant.
- He claims the curator figure emerged from the paradigm of proximity.
- He calls for a revival of autonomous, evaluative criticism.
- He mentions Piero Scaruffi, Paolo Mereghetti, and Aldo Grasso as models.
- He references Baudelaire, Pasolini, and Carla Lonzi.
- He asserts that the lack of incisive writing is the main problem.
Entities
Artists
- Pericle Guaglianone
- Carla Lonzi
- Baudelaire
- Pasolini
- Piero Scaruffi
- Paolo Mereghetti
- Aldo Grasso
- Harald Szeemann
Institutions
- Artribune
Locations
- Italy