Servaas Storm's INET Paper Debunks AI Bubble Claims Using Russell's Teapot Analogy
Servaas Storm, an economist, released a working paper via the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) that critiques eight forecasts made by AI CEOs in Silicon Valley. He employs Bertrand Russell's 1952 Teapot Analogy to illustrate that assertions regarding the rapid emergence of artificial general intelligence (AGI) are misguided, as large language models (LLMs) primarily function as pattern recognizers, exhibiting hallucination rates between 30-50%. Storm characterizes the current AI surge as a bubble driven by unsustainable funding and economic challenges. He anticipates that AI will transform rather than eliminate most white-collar roles, projecting a slight productivity increase of 0.2 percentage points by 2030. He cautions that AI generates 'bullshit jobs' and concludes that under shareholder capitalism, commercial AI cannot support workers. The paper appeared on Naked Capitalism.
Key facts
- Servaas Storm is a Dutch economist and author working on macroeconomics, technological progress, income distribution, economic growth, finance, development, structural change, and climate change.
- The paper uses Bertrand Russell's 1952 Teapot Analogy to argue that unfalsifiable AI claims require proof from those making them.
- Storm claims AGI predictions are structurally flawed because LLMs are predictive pattern matchers, not intelligent systems.
- LLM hallucination rates are 3-8% on closed-world questions and 30-50% on complex reasoning tasks.
- AI labs face escalating training and inference costs, with subscription fees not covering operational costs.
- Anthropic data shows 40% of U.S. occupations have no meaningful AI exposure.
- Economists predict a modest 0.2 percentage point increase in U.S. productivity growth by 2030 from AI.
- The paper estimates $4.5 trillion in AI investments during 2025-2035 will likely yield negative macroeconomic returns.
- 70% of non-management workers surveyed feel anxious or overwhelmed by AI tools.
- AI-generated 'work-slop' is demotivating and drains productivity, with workers wasting eight hours per week cleaning up AI output.
- AI coding agents break previously working code in 75% of long-term maintenance tasks.
- Companies have reduced entry-level hiring, leading to a projected senior developer shortage in 5-7 years.
- Cheap open-weight LLMs outperformed Anthropic's Mythos on basic security reasoning tasks.
- Algorithmic wage discrimination uses surveillance data to set lower wages for indebted workers.
- The paper was originally published on Naked Capitalism.
Entities
Institutions
- Institute for New Economic Thinking
- Naked Capitalism
- OpenAI
- Anthropic
- Nvidia
- Microsoft
- Meta AI
- Google DeepMind
- Goldman Sachs
- Federal Reserve
- Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Penn Wharton Budget Model
- Congressional Budget Office
- Wall Street Journal
- Section
- WalkMe
- GitClear
- Resume.org
- FRED database
- Job Opening and Labor Turnover Survey
- AISLE
- Distributed AI Research Institute
- Amazon
- Apple
- CrowdStrike
- JPMorgan Chase
- Cisco
- Broadcom
- Palo Alto Networks
- Linux Foundation
- Oracle
- Firefox
- OpenBSD
- MIT
- Palantir
Locations
- United States
- Silicon Valley
- Gulf
- Strait of Hormuz
- Iran