Roy Harris Declares Art Dead Since Dada in New Pamphlet Critiquing Artspeak
In his 2010 pamphlet 'The Great Debate About Art,' linguist Roy Harris contends that meaningful discussions surrounding art ceased with the advent of Dada. Released by Prickly Paradigm Press, this work addresses James Elkins's assertion of a crisis in art criticism. Harris argues that genuine critical evaluation disappeared during the 20th century, pinpointing 'art-for-art's-sake' as the core of contemporary artspeak. He critiques the Turner Prize and Nicholas Serota's 2000 defense of Michael Craig-Martin's 'An Oak Tree.' Furthermore, Harris examines three rationales for art: institutionalist, idiocentric, and conceptualist. He foresees a shift from artspeak to 'mediaspeak' as art evolves into mass entertainment. The 130-page pamphlet challenges Elkins's aspirations for ambitious criticism while recognizing the continued relevance of painting and sculpture.
Key facts
- Roy Harris published 'The Great Debate About Art' in 2010
- The pamphlet argues meaningful art debate ended with Dada
- Harris responds to James Elkins's 2003 critique of art criticism
- Prickly Paradigm Press published both Harris's and Elkins's works
- Harris criticizes Nicholas Serota's defense of Michael Craig-Martin's 'An Oak Tree'
- The Turner Prize exemplifies empty contemporary artspeak for Harris
- Harris traces 'art-for-art's-sake' to Benjamin Constant in early 19th century France
- Three justifications for art are analyzed: institutionalist, idiocentric, conceptualist
Entities
Artists
- Roy Harris
- James Elkins
- Michael Craig-Martin
- Benjamin Constant
- George Dickie
- Rosalind Krauss
- Ernst Gombrich
- Milton
Institutions
- Prickly Paradigm Press
- Tate Gallery
- Turner Prize
Locations
- Chicago