Renato Barilli criticizes curator-centric art world
Renato Barilli, professor emeritus at the University of Bologna and a militant critic for seventy years, argues that the current privileging of curators over critics undermines the future of art. He contends that healthy criticism requires combining critical writing with exhibition organization, as practiced by colleagues like Calvesi, Crispolti, Menna, Boatto, Celant, and Bonito Oliva. Barilli laments that since the new century, biennials have been led by prominent curators who often betray their stated principles, making conservative choices and selecting established names to avoid risk. He criticizes Okwui Enwezor, director of the 56th Venice Biennale, as the epitome of these flaws. Barilli asserts that conformity prevails over genuine curiosity and studio visits. The article appears in Artribune Magazine #34.
Key facts
- Renato Barilli is professor emeritus at the University of Bologna.
- Barilli has been a militant critic for seventy years, starting with an article on Il Verri.
- He believes criticism requires combining writing with exhibition organization.
- He names colleagues Calvesi, Crispolti, Menna, Boatto, Celant, and Bonito Oliva as sharing this approach.
- Barilli criticizes the trend of appointing prominent curators to lead biennials.
- He claims curators make conservative choices, selecting 'the usual suspects' to avoid risk.
- Okwui Enwezor, director of the 56th Venice Biennale, is singled out as the worst example.
- The article is published in Artribune Magazine #34.
Entities
Artists
- Renato Barilli
- Calvesi
- Crispolti
- Menna
- Boatto
- Celant
- Bonito Oliva
- Okwui Enwezor
Institutions
- University of Bologna
- Il Verri
- Venice Biennale
- Artribune
Locations
- Bologna
- Italy
- Venice