Reasoning Shortcuts in Neurosymbolic Learning Formally Analyzed
A recent preprint on arXiv (2604.23377) establishes reasoning shortcuts in neurosymbolic learning as a problem of constraint satisfaction. The researchers demonstrate that a specific discrimination property—ensuring that no valid concept mapping can be altered into another by merely swapping two concept values—is essential for learning without shortcuts under bijective mappings. However, they provide a counterexample indicating that this property alone is not adequate, even when a connected constraint graph is present. They introduce an ASP-based algorithm that checks if a particular constraint set uniquely defines the desired concept mapping, ensuring both soundness and completeness. Additionally, when shortcuts are identified, a greedy repair algorithm works to eliminate them by expanding the constraint set.
Key facts
- arXiv preprint 2604.23377
- Formalizes reasoning shortcuts as constraint satisfaction problem
- Discrimination property necessary but insufficient for shortcut-freeness
- Counterexample shows insufficiency even with connected constraint graph
- ASP-based algorithm verifies unique concept mapping
- Algorithm has proven soundness and completeness
- Greedy repair algorithm augments constraint set to eliminate shortcuts
Entities
Institutions
- arXiv