Public subsidies distort cultural market, says economist Fabio Severino
Economist Fabio Severino argues that public subsidies distort the cultural sector by making operators dependent on state funding rather than market demand. He claims this leads to uninnovative offerings, empty venues, and artists who cater to bureaucrats instead of audiences. Severino notes that mass cultural consumption—billions watching films, visiting museums, attending shows—should have ended the patron-artist duality, yet public funding perpetuates it. He criticizes the lack of market metrics like consumption abundance. As a solution, he proposes the Anglo-Saxon matching grant model: for every euro raised independently (ticket sales, sponsorships, donations), the state contributes another euro. This would force cultural operators to take entrepreneurial risks. Severino holds an MBA and PhD in marketing, teaches at La Sapienza University in Rome, and consults for the UN and ministries. The article was published in Artribune Magazine #63.
Key facts
- Public subsidies are a major market distortion in culture.
- Operators produce based on what funding they can get.
- Mass cultural consumption involves billions of people.
- Ticket sales are a marginal share of budgets.
- Subsidies lead to empty venues and uninnovative offerings.
- Severino proposes matching grants: one public euro for each private euro raised.
- Matching grants would require cultural operators to take entrepreneurial risks.
- Severino is an economist with MBA and PhD, teaches at La Sapienza, consults for UN.
Entities
Artists
- Fabio Severino
Institutions
- Artribune Magazine
- La Sapienza University of Rome
- United Nations
Locations
- Rome
- Italy