Peter Osborne's 'Crisis as Form' Examines Contemporary Art's Temporal Ontology
In his latest publication, 'Crisis as Form,' philosopher Peter Osborne delves into the intricate connection between contemporary art and time, building on ideas from his previous works, 'Anywhere or Not at All' (2013) and 'The Postconceptual Condition' (2018). He posits that contemporary art represents a 'disjunctive conjuncture' of various temporalities. To illustrate this, Osborne references a photograph of Juan Enrique Bedoya's piece, which alludes to Ed Ruscha's 1962 artwork 'oof,' featuring nine layers of meaning. He argues that contemporary art exists in a perpetual crisis, challenging established notions of the term. The book surveys almost a century of artistic contributions from figures like Matias Faldbakken and Marcel Duchamp. Published by Verso at £19.99, it introduces 'historical ontology,' though it lacks in-depth theoretical exploration.
Key facts
- Peter Osborne's 'Crisis as Form' continues his philosophical project begun in 2013
- Osborne argues contemporary art reflects 'disjunctive conjuncture' of multiple temporalities
- Artworks are retroactively transformed when activated in new contexts according to Osborne
- Osborne illustrates his theory with a photograph containing nine layers of references
- The book examines works by Matias Faldbakken, Luis Camnitzer, Cady Noland, and Marcel Duchamp
- Osborne contends contemporary art gives form to permanent crisis where crisis concepts have collapsed
- The book introduces 'historical ontology' concept without sustained theoretical development
- Published by Verso in softcover for £19.99
Entities
Artists
- Peter Osborne
- Juan Enrique Bedoya
- Ed Ruscha
- Matias Faldbakken
- Luis Camnitzer
- Cady Noland
- Marcel Duchamp
- Adorno
Institutions
- Verso