Persona Prompting Boosts Expertise Depth but Reduces Clarity in LLMs
A research paper available on arXiv (2605.29420) investigated persona prompting within large language models, utilizing 1,140 open-ended queries, 38 expert roles, and six distinct domains. The study assessed four different scenarios: absence of role prompts, a generic domain-expert prompt, retrieval of roles based on embeddings, and a hybrid approach that merges embedding searches with role selection via LLM. While the overall findings indicated minimal differences, a detailed metric-level examination uncovered a consistent tradeoff: implementing role prompting enhances the depth of expertise but diminishes clarity. These effects are significantly influenced by the specific conditions applied.
Key facts
- Study compares four prompting conditions across 1,140 open-ended questions
- Covers 38 expert roles and six domains
- Conditions: no role prompt, generic domain-expert prompt, embedding-based retrieval, hybrid retrieval
- Aggregate results show small overall differences between conditions
- Metric-level analysis reveals tradeoff: increased expertise depth, reduced clarity
- Effects are highly condition-dependent
- Published on arXiv with ID 2605.29420
Entities
Institutions
- arXiv