Paying peer reviewers speeds up academic publishing, journals find
In 2022, Jonas Kunst, a professor at BI Norwegian Business School, launched the journal Advances in Psychology, incentivizing reviewers with $100 for their evaluations. Authors usually hear back about their submissions in about 11 days, with the overall acceptance process averaging five months, and publication happening just nine days later. Kunst argues that paying reviewers improves accountability and the quality of reviews. After a successful trial offering $300 per review, Biology Open made this practice permanent in 2025, cutting the time from submission to first decision from 39 days to eight. In 2023, Critical Care Medicine experimented by paying $250 to half of 715 reviewers, resulting in a 53% acceptance rate. Chad Cook from Duke University noted that leading journals need to support this approach for it to become widespread.
Key facts
- Advances in Psychology pays $100 per review
- Average time from submission to final acceptance is about five months
- Biology Open's paid pilot reduced median first-decision time to eight days
- Critical Care Medicine offered $250 to half of 715 reviewers
- 53% of paid reviewers accepted vs 48% unpaid
- Paid reviews were submitted one day sooner on average
- Major publishers declined to comment on paid peer review
- Chad Cook says top journals must lead for change to scale
Entities
Institutions
- BI Norwegian Business School
- Advances in Psychology
- Biology Open
- Critical Care Medicine
- Association of American Publishers
- International Association of Scientific, Technical & Medical Publishers
- Duke University
- Inside Higher Ed