Octavian Eşanu Analyzes Landscape's Contradictions in ARTMargins Article
Octavian Eşanu's article published on May 1, 2021 examines landscape as a concept filled with inherent contradictions. The piece explores how landscape functions within politico-economic frameworks, serving both to preserve humanity's connection to the environment and to obscure injustices like land appropriation and rural labor exploitation. In terms of power dynamics, landscape has historically served opposing ideological agendas including colonialism's territorial expansion and nationalism's focus on territorial sovereignty. These contradictions manifest in formal artistic principles through the tension between horizontality and verticality. Horizontality in art history has been associated with landscape, suggesting spatial expansion but also traditional inertia. Verticality connects to portraiture and broader anthropological concepts of human triumph over nature. The article positions landscape as a medium shaped by multiple masters with conflicting purposes. Eşanu's analysis reveals how landscape representation conceals as much as it reveals about human relationships with land. The content is available through MIT Press as free material.
Key facts
- Article published May 1, 2021
- Author is Octavian Eşanu
- Published on ARTMargins Online
- Examines landscape as contradictory concept
- Discusses politico-economic dimensions of landscape
- Analyzes landscape's role in colonialism and nationalism
- Explores formal principles of horizontality vs verticality
- Content available through MIT Press as free material
Entities
Artists
- Octavian Eşanu
Institutions
- ARTMargins Online
- MIT Press
- ARTMargins
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Sources
- ARTMargins —
- ARTMargins —