New York State passes landmark bill restricting use of rap lyrics as criminal evidence
The New York State Senate has passed SB S7527, which bars the use of a defendant's artistic works as evidence in criminal proceedings, particularly focusing on the implications of rap lyrics. Research conducted by Jaeah Lee and Andrea Dennis reveals a troubling trend, with courts increasingly relying on rap lyrics as evidence—over 100 cases since 2005, whereas only one case involved non-rap lyrics by 2017. The legislation requires a definitive factual link between the artistic content and the legal case. Similar issues have arisen in the UK, highlighted by Tyrell Graham's 2019 situation. Experts contend that courts often misinterpret the poetic nature of rap, and studies show that lyrics are deemed more provocative when categorized as rap, echoing historical injustices like the Rodney King video.
Key facts
- New York State Senate passed SB S7527 last week
- Bill makes creative expression inadmissible as criminal evidence
- Requires prosecutors to prove literal factual nexus for admissibility
- Rap lyrics used as evidence in over 100 cases since 2005
- Only one non-rap lyric case found in US courts by 2017
- UK prosecutors used drill lyrics in 2019 Tyrell Graham case
- Studies show identical lyrics judged more offensive when labeled rap
- 1990 Cincinnati obscenity trial involved Robert Mapplethorpe photographs
Entities
Artists
- Robert Mapplethorpe
- Skengdo
- AM
- Tyrell Graham
- Shop Boyz
- Judas Priest
- W.A.S.P.
- Twisted Sister
- Rodney King
Institutions
- New York State Senate
- The New York Times
- The Guardian
- Crown Prosecution Service
- Contemporary Arts Center
- Parents Music Resource Center
Locations
- New York
- United States
- United Kingdom
- Cincinnati