New Methodology for Validating Ontology Mappings Using Metaphysical Commitments
A new paper on arXiv proposes a novel methodology for validating semantic mappings between data sources that are based on different foundation ontologies. The approach leverages the metaphysical commitments of the ontologies to constrain and validate the mappings. As a test case, the authors apply their method to mappings between the IES and BFO ontologies, focusing on cardinality constraints. They demonstrate the operationalization of these principles through SPARQL queries that validate the results of a mapping pipeline. The paper is categorized under Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence and was submitted to arXiv with the identifier 2608.08122. The work aims to improve the reliability of ontology mappings, which are crucial for data integration in various domains, including the arts and cultural heritage.
Key facts
- Paper discusses a methodology for validating semantic mappings between data sources based on different foundation ontologies.
- Methodology builds a framework based on the metaphysical commitments of the ontologies.
- Test case involves mappings between IES and BFO ontologies.
- Focus on providing cardinality constraints on the mappings.
- Principles operationalized through SPARQL queries validating mapping pipeline results.
- Paper is categorized under Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence.
- Submitted to arXiv with identifier 2608.08122.
- Aims to improve reliability of ontology mappings for data integration.
Entities
Institutions
- arXiv