New Criterion for Mapping Between Reinforcement Learning Frameworks
Different methodologies have been established by researchers to formalize reinforcement learning (RL). For an agent operating in one RL framework to function in another, it must undergo a conversion or mapping process. In a recent paper, the authors establish a foundation for examining the concept of relative-intelligence-preserving mappability across RL frameworks. They propose a criterion deemed sufficient for maintaining relative intelligence based on a specific intelligence measurement approach. Their findings indicate that this criterion is unattainable when transitioning between certain deterministic and stochastic RL frameworks, highlighting fundamental distinctions between these RL variations. The paper can be accessed on arXiv with the identifier 2112.07752 in the Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence section, including submission history and references from Semantic Scholar and DBLP. Additionally, it discusses arXivLabs, a platform for collaborative feature development, reinforcing arXiv's dedication to openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy.
Key facts
- Researchers have formalized reinforcement learning (RL) in different ways.
- An agent in one RL framework must be mapped to run in another framework's environments.
- The paper lays foundations for studying relative-intelligence-preserving mappability between RL frameworks.
- A criterion is introduced that is sufficient for relative intelligence to be preserved.
- The criterion cannot be met when mapping between certain deterministic and stochastic RL frameworks.
- This suggests inherent fundamental differences between different versions of RL.
- The paper is available on arXiv with identifier 2112.07752.
- The paper is categorized under Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence.
Entities
Institutions
- arXiv
- Semantic Scholar
- DBLP