ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

Museum wall texts still alienate visitors, argues Artribune editor

opinion-review · 2026-04-26

In a November 2025 opinion piece for Artribune, editor Massimiliano Tonelli critiques the persistent opacity of museum wall texts, using his experience at the Istanbul Biennial as a case study. Despite finding the exhibition coherent and engaging, Tonelli struggled with incomprehensible labels, which he attributes to a specialized jargon he calls "critichese" or "artese." He contrasts this with a Tate exhibition on contemporary Nigerian art, where labels were clear and accessible even to non-native English speakers and art novices. Tonelli argues that many institutions still communicate in code, undermining their stated goals of inclusion. He notes that while some museums are improving label writing through curator training, the broader challenge of audience engagement in a distraction-heavy ecosystem remains. Tonelli calls for simpler, curiosity-driven texts that do not make visitors feel inferior, as he did in Istanbul. The piece includes promotional blurbs for Artribune newsletters and affiliate book links.

Key facts

  • Massimiliano Tonelli is editor of Artribune.
  • The Istanbul Biennial featured themes of diversity, migration, labor, and exploitation.
  • Tonelli found the Biennial's wall texts incomprehensible despite good English.
  • A Tate exhibition on contemporary Nigerian art had clear, accessible labels.
  • Tonelli criticizes 'critichese' or 'artese' jargon used by some institutions.
  • He argues that opaque labels contradict claims of inclusivity.
  • Some museums are improving label writing through curator training.
  • The piece was published in November 2025 on Artribune.

Entities

Institutions

  • Artribune
  • Istanbul Biennial
  • Tate

Locations

  • Istanbul
  • Turkey
  • London
  • United Kingdom

Sources