Modular Framework for Uncertainty Reasoning in Knowledge Graphs
A recent thesis presents a modular approach designed for scalable uncertainty reasoning within knowledge graphs, tackling three specific types of uncertainty: vague attribute values, probabilistic existence of triples, and incomplete schema knowledge. This framework incorporates probabilistic literals along with a query algebra tailored for continuous attributes, a method that converts SPARQL provenance into manageable probabilistic circuits, and topology-aware geometric embeddings for statistical schema reasoning. The research seeks to address the absence of inherent uncertainty support in existing Semantic Web standards, which often results in computational challenges. The primary assertion is that distinct reasoning methods—algebraic, logical, and geometric—can effectively manage each level of uncertainty. The thesis can be found on arXiv under ID 2605.16568.
Key facts
- Thesis proposes modular framework for uncertainty reasoning in knowledge graphs.
- Uncertainty manifests at three levels: imprecise attribute values, probabilistic triple existence, incomplete schema knowledge.
- Current Semantic Web standards lack native support for uncertainty reasoning.
- Framework includes probabilistic literals and query algebra for continuous attributes.
- Compilation-based framework transforms SPARQL provenance into probabilistic circuits.
- Topology-aware geometric embeddings are used for statistical schema reasoning.
- Central hypothesis: specialized mechanisms (algebraic, logical, geometric) can handle each level.
- Thesis available on arXiv with ID 2605.16568.
Entities
Institutions
- arXiv