ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

Maryland consumers face $2B grid upgrade bill for out-of-state AI data centers

economy-finance · 2026-05-11

The Maryland Office of People’s Counsel (OPC) has filed a complaint with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) against PJM Interconnection, LLC, the largest U.S. electricity transmission company serving 13 states and Washington, D.C. PJM plans to charge Maryland $2 billion of its $22 billion grid upgrade, driven by data center demand for AI. The OPC argues this will cost Maryland consumers an extra $1.6 billion over ten years: $823 million for residential (≈$345 per customer), $146 million for commercial (≈$673 per customer), and $629 million for industrial customers (≈$15,074 per customer). Maryland People’s Counsel David S. Lapp stated that customers are paying for infrastructure benefiting data centers without causing the need or receiving meaningful benefit. The OPC contends that PJM’s cost allocation is unfair, as other states like Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois host more data centers. Maryland advocates for direct billing to areas where upgrades are built or to tech companies per President Donald Trump’s “ratepayer protection pledge.” The OPC cites “extreme uncertainty” in load growth from data centers, noting utilities benefit even if demand fails to materialize. Nationwide, about 69 jurisdictions have moratoriums on such projects, and nearly half of Americans oppose data centers in their neighborhoods, with some disputes turning violent.

Key facts

  • Maryland OPC filed a complaint with FERC against PJM Interconnection over $2B grid upgrade costs.
  • PJM Interconnection is the largest U.S. electricity transmission company, covering 13 states and D.C.
  • The $2B charge is part of PJM's $22B grid upgrade for data center demand.
  • Maryland consumers face an extra $1.6B over ten years: $823M residential, $146M commercial, $629M industrial.
  • Residential customers pay ≈$345 each, commercial ≈$673, industrial ≈$15,074.
  • Maryland People’s Counsel David S. Lapp says customers pay for infrastructure benefiting data centers without cause or benefit.
  • OPC argues PJM's cost allocation is unfair because other states host more data centers.
  • Maryland wants costs charged to areas where upgrades are built or to tech companies via Trump's ratepayer protection pledge.
  • OPC cites extreme uncertainty in data center load growth and notes utilities benefit even if demand doesn't materialize.
  • About 69 jurisdictions have moratoriums on data center projects; nearly half of Americans oppose them in their neighborhoods.

Entities

Institutions

  • Maryland Office of People’s Counsel
  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
  • PJM Interconnection, LLC
  • Tom's Hardware

Locations

  • Maryland
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Delaware
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Kentucky
  • Michigan
  • New Jersey
  • North Carolina
  • Ohio
  • Pennsylvania
  • Tennessee
  • Virginia
  • West Virginia
  • United States

Sources