ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

Lucas Ospina's 33 Theses Distinguish Curatorial Practice from Public Relations in Art

opinion-review · 2026-04-20

In his 2015 essay, Lucas Ospina outlines 33 opposing theses regarding the roles of curators and public relations specialists in the art sector. Initially published in Spanish and later translated by David Terrien for ArtReview's Summer 2015 edition, Ospina posits that while all curators function as public relations experts, the reverse is not true. Curators immerse themselves in language, emphasize art over its creators, and welcome risk, in contrast to PR specialists who concentrate on metrics and view art as a product. While curators craft historical narratives through their exhibitions, PR specialists utilize history in a more anecdotal manner. Ospina highlights the curators' instinctive approach and their detachment from market demands, unlike PR specialists who are fixated on public visibility and recognition.

Key facts

  • Lucas Ospina authored the essay 'Curating and Public Relations (in 33 theses)'
  • The essay was originally published in Spanish
  • David Terrien translated the essay into English
  • It appeared in ArtReview's Summer 2015 issue
  • Ospina argues all curators are public relations specialists but not all PRS are curators
  • The text contrasts 33 points between curatorial practice and public relations
  • Curators are described as essayists who prioritize language and artwork
  • Public relations specialists are depicted as transactional and focused on metrics

Entities

Artists

  • Lucas Ospina
  • David Terrien

Institutions

  • ArtReview

Sources