LLM Reasoning Redundancy Quantified at Scale
A new study on arXiv quantifies redundancy in reasoning traces of large language models. Researchers formalized redundancy as the fraction of trailing segmented steps that can be truncated while the model still produces the correct answer. Across four frontier reasoning models and two mathematical benchmarks, step-level redundancy ranged from 61% to 93%, with a median of 78%. The work provides the first large-scale measurement and theoretical explanation of reasoning redundancy, highlighting inefficiencies in chain-of-thought processes that incur high latency, GPU time, and energy costs.
Key facts
- Study measures redundancy in LLM reasoning traces at scale
- Redundancy defined as fraction of trailing steps that can be truncated without changing correctness
- Four frontier reasoning models tested on two mathematical benchmarks
- Step-level redundancy between 61% and 93%
- Median redundancy across conditions is 78%
- First large-scale quantification of reasoning redundancy
- Highlights inefficiencies in chain-of-thought reasoning
- Published on arXiv with ID 2605.23926
Entities
Institutions
- arXiv