LLM Overreliance Risks and Mitigation Strategies
A recent study published on arXiv emphasizes the necessity of addressing and measuring the excessive dependence on large language models (LLMs) in both research and practical applications. The authors outline risks that affect individuals and society, such as significant errors, governance issues, and cognitive deskilling. They investigate the traits of LLMs, design aspects of systems, and user biases that contribute to concerns regarding overreliance. Additionally, the paper reviews historical strategies for assessing overreliance, pinpointing three primary methods. It underscores the importance of developing AI systems that are compatible with human needs to prevent users from depending on LLMs beyond their limitations.
Key facts
- The paper is titled 'Measuring and mitigating overreliance to build human-compatible AI'.
- It was published on arXiv with ID 2509.08010.
- LLMs function as collaborative 'thought partners' in natural language.
- Overreliance risks include high-stakes errors, governance challenges, and cognitive deskilling.
- The paper identifies LLM characteristics, system design, and user biases as factors.
- It examines historical approaches for measuring overreliance.
- Three methods for measuring overreliance are identified.
- The goal is to build human-compatible AI systems.
Entities
Institutions
- arXiv