Jurisprudence and AI Alignment Share Fundamental Structure
A new paper on arXiv (2605.08416) argues that jurisprudence, the study of how judges decide cases, and AI alignment, the science of making AI conform to human values, share a fundamental structure. Both fields seek to predict and shape decisions by powerful actors—judges and increasingly powerful AIs—in unknown futures, using specification and interpretation of language. The essay draws on leading jurisprudence accounts, particularly Dworkin's principle-oriented interpretivism and Sunstein's positivist view of law as analogical reasoning, to explore insights between the two fields.
Key facts
- Paper title: Alignment as Jurisprudence
- arXiv ID: 2605.08416
- Announce type: new
- Compares jurisprudence and AI alignment
- Both fields predict and shape decisions by powerful actors
- Both use specification and interpretation of language
- Draws on Dworkin's interpretivism
- Draws on Sunstein's positivist account of law as analogical reasoning
Entities
Institutions
- arXiv