ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

Italy's ugly voting booths for President spark design outrage

opinion-review · 2026-04-27

Massimiliano Tonelli criticizes the newly installed voting booths for the Italian President election at Montecitorio as an architectural disgrace, worse than the previous 30-year-old catafalques. He notes that booths have only existed since 1992, when then-President of the Chamber Scalfaro introduced them to appease Marco Pannella's concerns over secret ballot. Tonelli argues that given COVID and the inability to design a decent temporary structure, it would have been better to have no booths at all, returning to pre-1990s practice. He suggests the old booths deserved permanent display at Triennale di Milano's Design Museum for their rationalist and decò references. The article implies the current design fails to uphold Italy's aesthetic dignity.

Key facts

  • New voting booths for Italian President election installed at Montecitorio
  • Booths criticized as worse than previous 30-year-old catafalques
  • Booths have existed only since 1992
  • 1992 introduced by President of Chamber Scalfaro due to Marco Pannella's protests
  • Constitution does not require voting booths for President election
  • Previous booths had rationalist and decò references worthy of Triennale di Milano's Design Museum
  • Author suggests no booths would be better than poor design
  • COVID cited as additional reason to eliminate booths

Entities

Artists

  • Massimiliano Tonelli

Institutions

  • Montecitorio
  • Triennale di Milano
  • Museo del Design della Triennale di Milano
  • Artribune
  • Camera dei Deputati

Locations

  • Montecitorio
  • Rome
  • Italy
  • Milan

Sources