Italian archaeology circular creates barriers for private excavation initiatives
A critical analysis of Italy's Circular No. 6 of 2016 argues that its restrictive interpretation of archaeological excavation activities undermines the Faro Convention and creates economic barriers for non-state actors. The circular mandates that only qualified archaeologists may work on excavations, effectively banning volunteer labor, and restricts summer schools to enrolled archaeology students, preventing organizations from generating revenue. This policy increases personnel costs and limits income opportunities, functioning as an economic barrier to entry that centralizes control under the state. The author, Stefano Monti, contends that while professional oversight is necessary, the regulations go too far by requiring specialists for tasks that do not require expertise, leading to inefficient resource allocation. The circular is seen as a political choice that demands higher state funding if it aims to exclude private initiative. The piece calls for clarity on Italy's strategic cultural policy direction.
Key facts
- Circular No. 6 of 2016 restricts archaeological excavation activities in Italy.
- Only qualified archaeologists can work on excavations, banning volunteers.
- Summer schools are limited to archaeology students, preventing profit for organizations.
- The circular is criticized as an economic barrier to entry for private entities.
- The policy increases labor costs and reduces revenue opportunities for excavation projects.
- The author argues the circular is incompatible with the Faro Convention.
- The piece suggests the policy centralizes archaeological activities under state control.
- Stefano Monti, partner at Monti&Taft, authored the analysis.
Entities
Institutions
- Artribune
- Monti&Taft
Locations
- Italy
- Germany