Irene Sofia Comi on the transformation of art criticism
Curator and critic Irene Sofia Comi argues that art criticism is not dead but evolving, needing to shed nostalgia and adapt to new formats like social media and independent publishing. She critiques the diminishing impact of criticism in a market-driven system, noting that since the 1960s figures like Celant and Lonzi warned of economic overreach. Comi sees parallels between the dismissal of curating and the dismissal of criticism, and advocates for a blurring of roles between critic and curator, citing historical examples like Achille Bonito Oliva and Celant who held both. She calls for criticism to become less self-referential and more accessible, while maintaining rigor. The interview is part of a series on Artribune, curated by Caterina Angelucci.
Key facts
- Irene Sofia Comi is a curator, researcher, and art critic.
- Comi believes art criticism is not dead but transforming.
- She cites Celant and Lonzi as critics who lamented market dominance since the 1960s.
- Comi notes that curatorial figures rose to prominence between the 1990s and early 2000s.
- She argues critics often dismiss curating as 'assault' (citing David Balzer).
- Comi suggests criticism can find expression on social media and independent publishing.
- She points to Achille Bonito Oliva, Celant, and Vergine as examples of critic-curators.
- The interview is part of a series on Artribune, curated by Caterina Angelucci.
Entities
Artists
- Irene Sofia Comi
- Germano Celant
- Carla Lonzi
- Achille Bonito Oliva
- Lea Vergine
- David Balzer
- Adriana Cavarero
- Caterina Angelucci
Institutions
- Artribune
Locations
- Italy