Intracortical Brain-to-Text: GRU Decoders Outperform Mamba on Phoneme and Character Targets
A recent investigation into the Brain-to-Text '25 benchmark evaluates recurrent (GRU) and selective state-space (Mamba) decoders for intracortical brain-to-text applications, focusing on phoneme and character targets. The top-performing phonetic GRU records a 12.62% PER and a 21.19% WER, while the leading textual GRU, following language model rescoring, achieves a 13.39% CER and a 26.28% WER. Although the Mamba hybrid shows competitive results, it falls short of the recurrent baseline. An analysis of errors indicates that failures are dependent on representation, highlighting confusions in articulatory-like phonemes compared to lexical and word-boundary mistakes.
Key facts
- Study compares GRU and Mamba decoders for intracortical brain-to-text
- Uses public Brain-to-Text '25 benchmark
- Phonetic GRU achieves 12.62% PER and 21.19% WER
- Textual GRU after LM rescoring reaches 13.39% CER and 26.28% WER
- Mamba hybrid does not surpass recurrent baseline
- Error analysis shows phoneme confusions vs lexical/word-boundary errors
- CTC objective used under one reproducible protocol
- Ablations isolate architectural contributions
Entities
Institutions
- arXiv