Graph-PDE Value Extensions for Sparse Goal-Conditioned Planning
A recent preprint on arXiv (2605.19185) examines sparse goal-conditioned planning framed as a graph-PDE Dirichlet extension issue. In this context, sparse cost-to-go labels on a goal-specific boundary are propagated to unlabelled graph vertices, enabling greedy rollouts to achieve the goal. The authors propose a local action-gap certificate: if the surrogate value error during the rollout remains under half of the actual action gap, the greedy rollout will succeed. The Absolutely Minimal Lipschitz Extension (AMLE), which represents the p=infinity endpoint of the graph p-Laplacian series, validates this certificate via a fill-distance bound based on a comparison principle. Experiments with 120 configurations derived from AntMaze layouts indicate that while harmonic extension yields a 0.584 aggregate success rate, AMLE methods are likely to enhance planning reliability.
Key facts
- Sparse goal-conditioned planning is modeled as a graph-PDE Dirichlet extension problem.
- Local action-gap certificate ensures greedy rollout reaches goal if surrogate error < half true action gap.
- AMLE (p=infinity graph p-Laplacian) instantiates the certificate via comparison-principle fill-distance bound.
- Harmonic extension can mis-rank local actions due to boundary hitting probabilities.
- Experiments on 120 AntMaze graph configurations show harmonic extension achieves 0.584 aggregate success rate.
- The paper is published on arXiv with ID 2605.19185.
Entities
Institutions
- arXiv