Grant assessors reveal what they actually look for in applications
Cat Dibley, an arts funding specialist with over 13 years of experience on both sides of the Australian arts funding table, shares insider knowledge on what grant assessors actually evaluate. She explains that applications should not just describe the work but argue why it should exist with public money at that moment. Specificity beats heartfelt claims: assessors need concrete numbers, named communities, and measurable outcomes. Budgets must reflect true costs, as assessors know real industry rates and will notice inconsistencies. Dibley emphasizes that the application is the project's advocate in the room; if an assessor has to argue for it, they need all the evidence. She notes that rejections often stem from lack of this specific skill set, not from the quality of the work.
Key facts
- Cat Dibley has over 13 years on both sides of the arts funding table.
- Grant applications should answer why the work should exist with public money.
- Specific claims with numbers and named communities are assessable.
- Budgets must reflect actual costs; assessors know industry rates.
- Applications serve as the project's advocate in panel discussions.
- Rejections are often due to lack of grant-writing skills, not work quality.
- Dibley has secured millions in grants as an applicant.
- She offers one-on-one coaching and grant writing courses.
Entities
Artists
- Cat Dibley
Institutions
- ArtsHub
- ScreenHub
Locations
- Australia
- New South Wales
- Awabakal Country