Governance and Management in Italian Cultural Institutions
The article discusses the governance models for Italian cultural enterprises, focusing on the role of the manager. It argues that the term 'manager' originates from Latin 'manus' (hand, action, enterprise) and should be understood broadly as someone capable of managing all resources—economic, financial, cultural, human, patrimonial, relational, and reputational—not just financial ones. The preferred model remains single-director, but a bicephalic model with separate cultural and financial directors is under discussion. The author emphasizes the need for proper training and reflection on governance models, especially given upcoming reforms for third-sector entities. The article notes that many statutes now require managerial skills, and universities offer relevant courses, yet there is still resistance to blending economics and culture. For micro-realities, combining different entities through network contracts may achieve efficiency. The piece calls for a coherent reflection on governance models and adequate training for current and future directors.
Key facts
- The preferred governance model in Italian cultural institutions is a single director with managerial skills.
- The term 'manager' derives from Latin 'manus' meaning hand, action, enterprise.
- A bicephalic model with separate cultural and financial directors is being discussed as an alternative.
- Statutes increasingly require managerial competencies from candidates.
- Universities and training courses offer programs in cultural management.
- There is resistance to the hybridization of economics and culture.
- For micro-realities, combining entities via network contracts may improve efficiency.
- The article calls for reflection on governance models and proper training for directors.
Entities
Institutions
- Artribune
Locations
- Italy
- Prato
- Milano