Fredric Jameson's Postmodernism Theory Examined for Contemporary Art Relevance
Fredric Jameson's analysis of postmodernism retains significant relevance for current discussions on contemporaneity in art history, theory, and criticism, despite its contradictions and outdated periodization. The discourse on the contemporary often resists historicism and emphasizes the incommensurability of global cultures and space-times, potentially undermining Jameson's focus on the culture-capital relationship and the theoretical need for totalization. This article, published by Bill Roberts on June 5, 2015, argues that Jameson's work remains crucial for politicizing and understanding contemporaneity more fully. The content is accessible via MIT Press under a subscription-only model, highlighting its academic nature. Jameson's problematic continues to inform debates, challenging tendencies in contemporary discourse that may dilute his theoretical imperatives.
Key facts
- Fredric Jameson's work on postmodernism is analyzed for its pertinence to contemporaneity
- The article was published on June 5, 2015 by Bill Roberts
- Postmodernism is considered irretrievable as a periodization but instructive for understanding contemporaneity
- The relationship between culture and capital is central to Jameson's problematic
- The discourse on the contemporary resists historicism and emphasizes incommensurability
- The article is available through MIT Press with subscription-only access
- Jameson's theoretical imperative to totalize remains relevant
- The content critiques tendencies in contemporary art theory that threaten Jameson's insights
Entities
Artists
- Bill Roberts
- Fredric Jameson
Institutions
- MIT Press
- ARTMargins Online