ARTFEED — Contemporary Art Intelligence

Federated Learning Architectures: Centralized vs Decentralized Trade-offs

other · 2026-05-18

A new research paper experimentally compares centralized, decentralized, and semi-decentralized federated learning architectures using the Fedstellar simulator, MNIST dataset, and MLP classifier. The study addresses a gap in literature by analyzing trade-offs between performance indicators across these three FL types. Federated Learning enables collaborative model training on distributed edge devices while preserving data privacy, crucial for the growing number of IoT devices generating massive data. Centralized storage faces challenges like limited communication, privacy concerns, and regulations. The paper provides experimental comparisons to understand strengths, limitations, and performance trade-offs, helping practitioners choose the right architecture based on application needs.

Key facts

  • Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed edge devices while preserving data privacy.
  • The paper compares Centralized (CFL), Decentralized (DFL), and Semi-decentralized (SDFL) FL architectures.
  • Experiments use the Fedstellar simulator, MNIST dataset, and MLP classifier.
  • Very few research studies have experimentally compared these three types of architectures.
  • The analysis focuses on trade-offs between different performance indicators.
  • Choosing the right FL architecture depends on the application's needs.
  • Centralized storage faces issues like limited communication, privacy, and regulations.
  • The paper overcomes the lack of experimental analysis in this area.

Entities

Institutions

  • arXiv

Sources