Factors Behind AI System Non-Development and Abandonment
A recent study published on arXiv examines the reasons behind the failure to build or the abandonment of AI systems prior to their deployment. This research performs a scoping review of existing academic literature, resources from civil society, and grey literature, which encompasses journalism and industry reports. Utilizing thematic analysis, it identifies six categories of influencing factors: ethical issues, feedback from stakeholders, challenges in the development lifecycle, organizational dynamics, limitations in resources, and legal complications. The findings emphasize that early-stage decisions significantly influence which systems make it to release, highlighting a critical area for intervention. The paper seeks to shed light on pre-deployment decision-making, a facet often neglected in responsible AI research that usually concentrates on systems that have been deployed.
Key facts
- The paper is on arXiv with ID 2604.28053.
- It investigates factors influencing AI non-development and abandonment.
- The study includes a scoping review of academic, civil society, and grey literature.
- A taxonomy of six factor categories is developed: ethical concerns, stakeholder feedback, development lifecycle challenges, organizational dynamics, resource constraints, and legal issues.
- The research focuses on pre-deployment decisions.
- It argues that early-stage decisions are underexplored intervention points.
- Responsible AI research usually examines deployed systems.
- The paper aims to increase visibility into why systems are not built.
Entities
Institutions
- arXiv