DPrivBench Benchmark Tests LLMs' Ability to Reason About Differential Privacy Algorithms
A new benchmark called DPrivBench evaluates whether large language models can automate reasoning about differential privacy, a technique for protecting data privacy. Differential privacy requires expert-level knowledge to design and verify algorithms, creating barriers for non-specialists. Previous approaches have depended on specialized verification languages needing substantial domain expertise or remained semi-automated with human guidance. The benchmark presents instances asking whether a function or algorithm satisfies a stated differential privacy guarantee under specific assumptions. It covers a broad range of differential privacy topics and spans diverse difficulty levels while resisting shortcut reasoning through trivial pattern matching. Experiments reveal that while the strongest models handle textbook mechanisms adequately, all models struggle with advanced algorithms. The work investigates the potential for LLMs to lower the high barrier faced by practitioners lacking expertise in this complex field. The research was announced on arXiv with the identifier 2604.15851v1.
Key facts
- DPrivBench is a benchmark for evaluating LLMs' reasoning about differential privacy
- Differential privacy protects data privacy but requires expert-level reasoning
- Designing and verifying DP algorithms creates high barriers for non-expert practitioners
- Previous approaches rely on specialized verification languages or semi-automated methods
- The benchmark asks whether functions/algorithms satisfy stated DP guarantees under assumptions
- DPrivBench covers broad DP topics and diverse difficulty levels
- Benchmark resists shortcut reasoning through trivial pattern matching
- Experiments show strongest models handle textbook mechanisms but struggle with advanced algorithms
Entities
Institutions
- arXiv