Deontic Argumentation Semantics for Weak Permission
A new semantics for deontic argumentation supports weak permission, addressing a known limitation of grounded semantics. Grounded semantics fail to support weak permission when two obligations conflict. The proposed theory defines Deontic Argumentation Theory to account for weak permission and recalls previous results about grounded semantics. The work is published on arXiv under computer science and artificial intelligence.
Key facts
- The paper addresses semantics for deontic argumentation supporting weak permission.
- Grounded semantics do not support weak permission when two obligations conflict.
- A new definition of Deontic Argumentation Theory accounts for weak permission.
- The paper recalls results about grounded semantics.
- A new semantics is proposed that supports weak permission.
- The paper is categorized under Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence.
- Published on arXiv with ID 2509.25781.
- arXivLabs is mentioned as a framework for collaborative projects.
Entities
Institutions
- arXiv
- arXivLabs
- Semantic Scholar