Dean Kissick's Harper's essay critiques political art's impact on beauty and strangeness
In Harper's magazine, Dean Kissick, a British writer residing in New York, released an essay titled 'The Painted Protest'. In it, he contends that the intersection of art and politics over the past eight years has lessened art's beauty and emotional resonance. Now 41, Kissick sees his work as a continuation of Tom Wolfe's 1975 book 'The Painted Word'. He examines the art scene post-2008, observing that by 2017, social justice movements had increased the visibility of various artists. Although initially thrilled, he later perceived this diversity as monotonous. He criticizes the stagnation in aesthetic progress and urges critics to explore art outside prevailing trends. The essay ends by suggesting that longing for earlier art might signal a desire to become an art historian.
Key facts
- Dean Kissick published 'The Painted Protest' in Harper's magazine
- The essay argues politics has robbed art of beauty and strangeness over the last eight years
- Kissick positions his work as successor to Tom Wolfe's 1975 book 'The Painted Word'
- Kissick turns 41 this year and interned with Hans Ulrich Obrist
- The essay references the 1998 Coagula journal volume 'Most Art Sucks' edited by Walter Robinson
- Kissick notes aesthetics have not advanced much in the past decade
- The writer suggests aging artworld participants often blame new art for their dissatisfaction
- Kissick advises exploring beyond familiar galleries to find art outside dominant paradigms
Entities
Artists
- Dean Kissick
- Walter Robinson
- Tom Wolfe
- Hans Ulrich Obrist
- Rhea Dillon
Institutions
- Harper's
- Coagula
Locations
- New York
- United States